Merck Former Chief of Vaccine Division Admits Vaccines are Contaminated.

Posted on December 6, 2007. Filed under: Merck Former Chief of Vaccine Division Admits Vaccines | Tags: , , , , , , , |

Dr. Hilleman the head of the Vaccine Division at Merek and who developed the Polio, Mumps, Rubella and Measles vaccines, said: “Vaccines are the bargain basement technology of the 20th century.”

In the taped interview (with about 6 Merck executives in the room, their nervous laughter audible in the tape) Dr. Hilleman explains how in his search for uninfected monkeys, Merck imported green monkeys from Africa. Those monkeys, it turned out, were carrying the AIDS virus:  “I didn’t know we were importing AIDS.” Responding to the question, “so, it was you who introduced the AIDS virus to this country?” He said, YES.

Dr. Hilleman also acknowledged that he discovered that the Sabine polio vaccine (manufactured by Merck) was infected with the SV-40 cancer virus. In the process of developing vaccines Merck scientists are shown to blithely disregard public safety as they conducted massive tests exposing millions of unsuspecting people to wild viruses. Dr. Hilleman acknowledged that the cancer infected polio vaccine had been tested in massive field trials in Russia, then in the U.S.

The issues raised in this candid interview raise serious doubts about the propaganda the public has been fed about the safety of vaccines.  Vaccines that have been promoted as “safe and effective” miraculous cures have been infecting millions of people with cancer, leukemia, and AIDS. Recent pathology tests on cancerous tumors in humans contain the SV40 virus.

  The video was posted on You Tube, but has since been removed, but you can watch a censored version  here; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tM8gk8C69M.

This shows another blatent disregard for medical ethics. And the “BADSCIENCE” bloggers would have us believe that homeopaths are not following a code of ethics only because we claim that homeopathy can facilitate cure!!

Advertisements

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

23 Responses to “Merck Former Chief of Vaccine Division Admits Vaccines are Contaminated.”

RSS Feed for Goodscience Weblog Comments RSS Feed

Regarding “I didn’t know we were importing AIDS.” Responding to the question, “so, it was you who introduced the AIDS virus to this country?” He said, YES.”

Thats a shocking piece of information. Or it would be shocking if it were true. According to this article in WIRED, (available here: http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/09/did-merck-bring.html) the YES comment was a joke. “It’s clear that they’re joking. Telling the truth about the infected monkeys, but joking about the implication of that. Sick jokes poorly told, and how anybody could find them funny is beyond me, but jokes nonetheless. There’s absolutely no evidence that the virus ever made the jump from monkeys into Merck’s vaccines and into people.”

The author then goes on to say that: “Vaccines are one of the greatest advances in modern public health — and I’m saying this as someone who still thinks there could be a small but real thimerosal-autism link. In many places, that makes me an anti-vaccine crackpot. But I’m not so cracked as to be unable to distinguish between joke and reality, or to judge all vaccines by something that happened 50 years ago, or to suggest that we risk millions of lives on the strength of a few scientifically controversial reports.” Quite.

Regarding, “bloggers would have us believe that homeopaths are not following a code of ethics only because we claim that homeopathy can facilitate cure”

Well its the Society of Homeopaths that states clearly that advertising for homeopathy which purports to offer a cure for a named disease is a breach of the SoH’s code of ethics. If you don’t like that you can complain to the SoH, but they are clear that any advertising by homeopaths which claims to cure diseases is unethical.

woodchopper said: Telling the truth about the infected monkeys, but joking about the implication of that. Whaaaaaaat?

And yawn. Another defender of the great white hope of modern medicine putting a spin on the clear evidence. Clear evidence. Well, at least he/she admitted that the monkeys were contaminated.

[…] Click here to go to the goodscience.wordpress.com blog and see the discussion and a link to the vid… […]

‘freetochoosehealth’ – I merely pointed out an error in the post. If you want to describe that as spin that’s up to you. But a statement of fact cannot be impertinent.

[…] also goodscience’s blog with a link to a video interview with Dr Maurice Hilleman, former chief of Merck’s vaccine […]

Hello Woodchopper,
I understand that it seemed to be a joke, unfortunately that does not make it an untruth. As far as being in breach of the code of ethics for homeopaths, I said “facilitate” cure. It seems like splitting hairs, but it is actually an important distinction.

Goodscience – that appears to be a joke (albeit in very bad taste), and the lack of any other evidence, make it extremely unlikely that there is any truth in the notion that Merck ‘introduced AIDS into the USA’. As research indicates that it is most likely that HIV arrived in the USA via Haitian citizens (see here for example: http://bayblab.blogspot.com/2007/11/hiv-out-of-africa-via-haiti.html) the notion that it was introduced by Merck via infected monkeys can safely be dismissed as erroneous.

The SoH Code of Ethics (point 72) states that homeopaths are required “To avoid making claims (whether explicit or implied; orally or in writing) implying cure of any named disease.” And that “No advertising may be used which expressly or implicitly claims to cure named diseases.” (point 42)(see here: http://www.homeopathy-soh.org/about-the-society/documents/CodeofEthicsApr04.pdf)

I can’t see how the use of the word ‘facilitate’ can be viewed as anything other than *implying* a cure. But perhaps you can enlighten me.

If you have a problem with implying a cure of a named disease being unethical then you should take that up with the SoH.

I can’t see how asking SoH members to comply with the society’s Code of Ethics can be controversial. Surely its a good idea for homeopaths to behave ethically.

Hello again woodchopper,

The word, facilitate;
“Simplify process: to make something easy or easier to do”.
The word, imply;
“To make something understood without expressing it directly.”

How can you say that “to imply” has the same meaning as “to facilitate”?? You say homeopaths and homeopathic remedies “imply cure”. I am telling you that they are a catalyst that facilitates cure. I am sorry, but nomenclature is VERY important in this discussion on ethics. You cannot be close; you need to be exact……….at least that is what your bad science comrades are implying.

Goodscience – I read (second hand over here at http://dcscience.net/?p=208) that Trish Moroney, Professional Conduct Officer of the Society of Homeopaths has stated in the latest edition of the Society of Homeopaths’ Newsletter that:

“Words like ‘cure’ and ‘treat’ are not allowed to be used in advertising in any published form.” [Obvious typo corrected]

There isn’t much more to say on the subject is there.

(But please make another post if I missed something.)

And isn’t there an oath that physicians take………the Hippocratic Oath?? And isn’t there a line in that oath that says “First do no harm”???

I am not a homeopath nor live in the UK.

I think the SOH may need to amend their code to accurately reflect what they do.

Homeopaths treat people who present with certain health conditions, and those conditions may improve or, gulp, even go away completely while under homeopathic care- a cure.

I sense a society of fear in the UK……big brother is watching……
-GG

[…] Merck Former Chief of Vaccine Division Admits Vaccines are Contaminated. […]

Woodchopper, yes you missed a very big point here in your continued reiterance of a weak rebuttal regarding using the term “cure” and your redirecting the discussion away from the point of the unethical side of vaccination production and use.

The point is this:

Who is advertising here?

No-one.

Also, the word “Facillitate” makes a huge distinction, since what homeopaths set out to *imply* is that there are inherent SELF-healing dynamics that work independently of any medicine, and that it’s these forces which are always at work under any circumstances of healing. And its this area, which again is the NON-PHYSICAL area, that homeopathy works to FACILLITATE. Homeopathy facillitates the constant re-organization and stability of life.

And before you refute the non-physicality of healing, let me ask you this: what is it then that makes the osteoblasts and osteoclasts reform broken bone? What is it that allows ATP to be an energy intermediary in cell metabolism? What is it thats behind all physiology? What is it that allows the human being to be an independent self governing being, that is no longer that being upon death? What is it Woodchopper?

I call it energy, what do you call it? the soul? Oh, now were talking religion. Are we? If I killed you right now to demonstrate that there was no such thing as life force, or soul or whatever it is that keeps the human system alive and FUNCTIONING (see any relation to health here?) then would you keep living? Is it simply because I’ve broken the machine that you’ve died? Do you REALLY believe that even from your contracted scientific and rational mind?

If so can you prove your souless world with a randomized double blind placebo study?

Because its sure easy for me to disprove a souless world, simply by the fact that things die. If things die, they live – NO?

Did I make enough implications/assumptions for you there?

“The point is this:

Who is advertising here?

No-one.”

Marty – your point is irrelevant. As I have already pointed out, point 72 of the SoH Code of Ethics states that homeopaths are required:

“To avoid making claims (whether explicit or implied; orally or in writing) implying cure of any named disease.”

This is a general requirement, and not one specific to advertising, which is covered by point 42 (see above).

I really do find it extraordinary that homeopaths seem to be so misinformed about their own Code of Ethics.

“If I killed you right now to demonstrate that there was no such thing as life force,”

Well that’s a really ethical statement.

“your redirecting the discussion away from the point of the unethical side of vaccination production and use.”

Marty – I have made two comments on that subject already. Please feel free to reply to them.

Oh, please… the article just linked by Lynne:

The active ingredient in all flu vaccines manufactured by “M” is mercury. No other ingredient in any “M” flu vaccine has any effect on influenza in any way. Only mercury has any effect on the flu.

That’s total nonsense. Mercury has no effect on flu, or on any other virus. The entire article is nonsense, intended to look like the “confessions of a former insider” with the aim of propping up some people’s fears about Big Pharma.

Actually, Rob, if you knew anything about homeopathy, you would know that,in fact, various types of homeopathic mercury are very effective flu remedies.

This is one of the reasons that this article to me was worth considering, despite the anonymity of the author, which raises some doubt in my mind.

Lynne – homeopathic remedies may well contain mercury. But the article’s assertion that mercury is “active ingredient in all flu vaccines” is completely false.

There isn’t much point discussing an article that is so divorced from reality.

Lynne – this post suggests that the mercury article you linked to is a hoax.

http://salonesoterica.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/was-pharma-exec-vaccine-expose-a-hoax/

Merck should be sued for injecting people
with the Aids and Cancer Viruses. They only
did this so people could get sick and then
they make the money off of treating you for an
illness they started.
Government is complaicent in this because
they are bribed by MERCK to “Turn the
other Cheek” and keep silent. Let’s ALL stop
taking vaccines, and if they try and force us
then they will have to come for our guns too.
IG Farbon (World’s largest Pharmaceutical
Company)created Adolf Hitler by giving him
money to build his war machine and gave him
the chemical weapons to use in the
concentration camps. These are the same people
giving you your medication.
Fight Back. Speak out against these Pigs,
Refuse to get ANY Vaccines.

[…] Click here to go to the goodscience.wordpress.com blog and see the discussion and a link to the vid… […]

Wow Article , I thought it was wonderful

I look forward to more great postings like this one. Does Your Blog have a newsletter I can subscribe to for updates?


Where's The Comment Form?

  • December 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov   Jan »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: